Sunday, January 10, 2010

Poster 1


Tuesday, November 17, 2009

The OSI Model


OSI Model
Data unit Layer Function
Host
layers
Data 7. Application Network process to application
6. Presentation Data representation and encryption
5. Session Interhost communication
Segment 4. Transport End-to-end connections and reliability
Media
layers
Packet 3. Network Path determination and logical addressing
Frame 2. Data Link Physical addressing
Bit 1. Physical Media, signal and binary transmission

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

defining hackable architecture

Hackable Architecture

How do you make architecture that is adaptable?

  • Think of platforms, not solutions - overbuild infrastructure, underbuild features
  • Build with an architecture of layers; enable fast layers to change rapidly (learning); slower layers enable stability
  • Create seamful experiences, based around behaviour not aesthetics; often includes modular design
  • Undesigned products, or rather not overdesigned; to invite the user in, to encourage evolution
  • Define vocabularies, or basic patterns of interaction
  • Leave space to evolve (if physical/spatial, build with modular shapes which can extend easily
  • Enable users to manage the at-hand information and interactions; the surface layers
  • Create an aesthetic of ongoing process
  • This process implies that the designer provides support, engagement over time etc.
  • Sunday, October 18, 2009

    How OMA works, Maybe

    http://www.oswalt.de/en/text/txt/omawork_p.html

    An essay on the methods at OMA

    Saturday, October 17, 2009

    Cultural Infrastructure

    After two consecutive reviews on my thesis I wasn't sure where to go. Luckily Roger Sherman was there to help with his essay "Counting (on) Change: Property." This essay breaks down several complex property rights scenarios to reveal an entrepreneurial method of design. This method does not enforce control by planning out specific strategies. Instead it sets up a system for adaptation and allows for "more self-regulating design strategies." Suddenly John's comment, "if you build a slanted wall with bricks as hand-holds, children will play on it and graffiti will inevitably show up," makes perfect sense. The space needs to be a place for users to invest their cultural capitol and mold the space into what they need.

    The site, the intersection between San Fernando Road, Hubbard Street, the Metrolink Antelope Valley Line, Metro Shuttle line 634, Metro Rapid Bus lines 734 & 794, and Metro Local Bus line 224, is one of two connections between the North and South sides of San Fernando City. Since this spot collects all the transportation from private home to private work, it becomes the perfect spot for a new public infrastructure. This piece of infrastructure would collect cultural capitol in a public space(something not very common in the San Fernando Valley).

    The next step is to figure out what sorts of programs are currently happening in improvised locations and catalog them. This will establish a language of necessary equipment for the infrastructure and hopefully provide some sort of pattern to help project future needs. After the catalog is complete, the new space can be a prototype for other such traffic collectors in the city.

    Tuesday, October 6, 2009

    "Spaces and Events" - Bernard Tschumi

    QUESTION: 
    Can space be separated from event?


    HISTORY:
    70s - "Architects become mere decorators when parts of developer led teams designing large buildings." "Architectural critics concentrate on surface readings, signs, metaphors, and other modes of presentation."

    80s - Architects rejected program as just part of failed functionalist theories. Instead they occupied themselves with what Tschumi describes as "a form of decorative painting."

    Architecture became a collection of architects with no collected direction, each just standing by their own beliefs.
    "The restricted notion of postmodernism that ensued--a notion diminished by comparison with literature or art---completely and uncritically reinserted architecture into the cycle of consumption."

    REACTION:
    A blending of verbal and visual discourse was initiated at the AA. Methods and media not used in the field at the time created a new way to study the overlap between visual and verbal. Photography and film as well as text and manifesto were all used as part of the projects. The new media formats and their overlayment produced "a complex juxtaposition of abstract concepts and immediate experiences, contradictions, superimpositions of mutually exclusive sensibilities." The use of narratives as program came out of the products of superimposition. Instead of using something static, a narrative would create a frame for events and spaces to interact. In this case the narrative was a piece of literature.

    While literature uses vocabulary and grammar structures to mold ideas and narratives, architecture has the ability to control events using spatial rules like juxtaposition or distortion.

    Since events and programs can be manipulated, the relationship between program and building can be explored.


    To explain these new relationships between space and event drawing had to find new methods of representation: the hybrid drawing is born. It examines the middle place between two drawings and how they relate. These drawings seek a response to the program examined. At this point the drawings, which still represent architecture, become the boldest embodiment of the event within the architecture.


    ANSWER:
    Architecture is the "assemblage" of space and event.

    "Around the World in Three Hundred Yards" - An Essay by Patrick Wright

    "What is to be done about Dalston Junction?" Patrick Wright asks intially. His essay "Around the World in Three Hundred Yards" never really answers the question directly, but it does catalogue all the different conditions and histories of a short section of Dalston Lane plagued by blight. While the essay bursts with local examples from the actual Dalston Lane, the conditions described exist in every city. These circumstances appear at places where zoning mixes in awkward ways and "tangle[s] of dishonoured roads" expose the grid's short-comings. The same conditions that afflict Dalston Lane are found on San Fernando Road in San Fernando Valley. Here is a test as proof:
    "[San Fernando Road] is a jumble of residential, commercial, and industrial activities, but zoning is not the only kind of development on which this street, if not its surrounding area, has missed out. In the fifties it escaped the kind of standardization Ian Nairn described as subtopia ('Subtopia is the annihilation of the site, the steam-rollering of all individuality of place to one uniform and mediocre pattern'). While it has certainly suffered daily agonies through the eighties, it was at least spared the kind of theming that has turned genuinely historical streets in more prosperous parts of the country into simulacra, gutting them in the name of taste. No 'lifestyle designer' has ever come to divide the 'targeted' denizens of [San Fernando Road] from the non-targeted, or to kill off the old street, with its confusion of nationalities, classes, and styles, and redefine it in marketing terms. We may be sure that Sir Rodney Fitch, design mogul of the eighties, has never worked here."
    The description is so universal that all it takes is a replacement of the name of the road. Not only does the general description fit, each point also applies perfectly:
    1. Zoning - On SFR airports share edges with residential neighborhoods which border industrial estates which transition seamlessly into public space without any greater sense of logic or pattern.
    2. Subtopia - While the surrounding neighborhoods and streets developed with post-war housing and freeways in the fifties, SFR stayed locked in its industrial mode based on its past as a major highway.
    3. Simulacra - Again, while roads like Hollywood Blvd. developed into "better representations of history," SFR was left to develop freely.
    4. Design - There exists no control over the street. Each city the SFR passes through deals with the road in their own way, however there are no designs implemented and no attempt at controlling demographics or other living patterns. The road is an automatic assemblage of random program that fit at construction time consisting of whatever materials were available.



     Lebon's Corner


    San Fernando Rd. & Truman St.

    Wright describes the outcomes of these conditions on Dalston Lane which match the reactions found on SFR. There exists a multitude of commercial and industrial undertakings with the only logic being necessity. The road is made up of "indigenous north-east London enterprise mixed up with a whole array of brave multicultural endeavor." This is not only a mixture of multiple zoning types, but also of multiple cultures and capitalist spirits. Through this ad hoc expansion and reuse clusters of local industry grow. For instance groupings of metal workshops around the Sunland area support each other and share projects to survive. SFR's odd combination of business types becomes an asset

    The comparison becomes severed when Wright examines the spirit of volunteerism and community action. While he says that voluntary organisations attempt to fix social wholes by moving in and setting up projects, not much of this is seen around SFR. While there is a community health service named MEND(Meet Each Need with Dignity) along the road, there are no voluntary actions set up and no meetings advertised like on Dalston Lane. Missing is also a governmental presence. There is no sign of social programs on the street or attempted rejuvenations. The only inkling of the existence of government are new bus stops and signage(albeit not connected by sidewalks).

    Their absence, luckily, seems unimportant since Wright claims that none of these attempts have worked for Dalston Lane. The only positive change has been due to a Free Form Arts Trust set up on the lane. It sets up projects on Dalston Lane and surrounding areas that act as spot interventions which "catalyse change and community development." While no such organisation exists on SFR, such interventions can be imagined and easily sited.

    Monday, October 5, 2009

    "Robinson in Space" - A Film by Patrick Keiller

    Patrick Keiller uses a series of seven journeys between a wanderer/surveyor named Robinson and a Narrator to explore the current state of England and the histories that lead it to that status. After the film begins with a train ride and the proclamation for a revolution of everyday life, the two characters start on a project to decipher "the problem of England." This project unfolds as seven journeys modeled after Daniel Defoe's "A tour thro' the whole island of Great Britain." Each journey differs geographically and highlights similarities with the other journeys. Together the journeys point out multitudes of shipping ports, networks of transportation, processing mills and distribution centers that create the economy and life of England.

    Keiller's observations of the English economy point to a very specific process. This process begins with the import of raw materials like coal, petroleum products and iron ore via immense shipping operations. From the multitude of ports the materials move to large industrial complexes that employ very few people and create a very narrow range of specific products like latex for S&M clothing, rubber toys for children, fighter jets and hand cuffs. A large majority of these products then get sent back to the ports and exported to different countries around the world. The results of this process are felt in each Journey. The domestic extraction of natural materials has almost stopped and the sites previously occupied by quarries and coal mines have become Tesco distribution centers and Social Security offices.

    The film explores these spaces of infrastructure and flows in great depth. It also mentions historically important writers, artists and politicians. However it fails to say anything about the common person except that amid dreams of international cities and future megacities, most people still live in the mundane. This means that Keiller really does not believe that the spaces where people live and work are important. The important spaces are those of flows. According to Keiller these spaces let the economy thrive and are curated by the government via direct grants to companies, construction of major ports and roadways and the sabotage of labor unions when necessary. That view of infrastructure ends the movie when four bridges spanning only themselves fade out to the credits.

    Stream of thoughts after the jump